12-07-2017, 02:14 PM
(12-07-2017, 12:23 AM)GMDino Wrote:i'm not saying anything is tainted, I'm just trying to have a discussion. Burfict never hit his head, but they said he approached from the side which is now illegal. I'm not sure how else you are supposed to hit a crossing receiver so chalk another one up for tying the hands of the defense.If anyone hasn't seen the hit pic.twitter.com/6s5DBLifPc
— Laces Or Faces (@LacesOrFaces) August 28, 2017
I'd explain that Bufict hits him from the side/behind vs JuJu and Burfict in a line going toward each other and Burfict getting hit in the chest...but really what could a Steelers fan say that and Bengals fan wouldn't think is tainted?
I mean not even the NFL could explain it to the Bengals.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/sports/wp/2017/08/28/vontaze-burfict-says-his-hit-was-legal-the-nfl-strongly-believes-otherwise-whos-right/?utm_term=.d7f0d9be6a48
So what difference would it make?
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall