02-12-2018, 10:57 PM
(02-12-2018, 12:54 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: Probability of winning would have been drastically different in the second half if the interception hadn't happened.
Let's say that they don't come out in the second half with even more confidence and playing even more fired up and it goes the same way, just with different scores, then, at worst, the probability of winning is split down the middle, with the Cardinals actually having most likely a better chance because they'd be winning the most of the second half.
How the hell can you out play someone but almost never have more than a 25% chance of winning? How can it be a game that they had no business winning, but had a greater than 95% chance of winning for more than one quarter in the second half?
Logic isn't your strong suit, is it?
