Are The Steelers Good or Just Lucky?

[BFritz21]

(02-14-2018, 06:57 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: You did beat some good teams with good defenses that year (namely Chicago and Pit), but you lost to just as many or more (Ind, Jax and Pit).  And you also lost to the Bills (29th ranked D).  

Also: you bring up the 37 points against the Colts (in a loss) as if it supports your point.  But your point was that Carson would've beaten the Steelers because he regularly overcame his own bad defense.  And he didn't do that against Indy: he scored a ton and still didn't overcome your bad D.  So, that particular example actually supports the opposite point.

Finally, yes, I overlooked the sitting of starters in the season finale.  My bad.  But why do you give yourself an automatic win there intead of just discounting the loss and saying it's really 3-3? They would've had a legit chance against your starters, yet you write it off as a win.  This kind of sums up your 'logic': Whenever there is an unknown, you automatically assume it benefits the Bengals and goes against the Steelers. But this is not logic.  It's homerism.

He didn't do every time, but he did overcome his bad defense a lot.

He didn't overcome his bad defense in Indy, but he also didn't score first like we would have against Pit (a TD).

(02-14-2018, 12:07 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Still complaining about rep.  Sad.  

You say that I'm complaining about rep to avoid admitting that you have nothing to refute that you never have anything of any credibility to offer in response to anything I ever say.  Sad, but not surprising.

(02-14-2018, 03:35 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: Yes. Yes he is. 

I didn't say anything in that post that you could be referencing a "Yes.  Yes he is." to, so what are you talking about?