It's time we moved on from Dunlap.

[XsandOs]

(04-09-2018, 02:45 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Agreed. If you send me back in time and I have to choose either Burfict or Dunlap, I'm choosing Dunlap every time. 

People forget, the defense was looking good before Burfict was even there...mainly due to the d-line. In particular, the play of Atkins and Dunlap.

We shouldn't have to choose though. We can afford both.

(04-09-2018, 03:08 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: It is close though.

Both are very good players and with Burfict's problems i can understand why someone would say Dunlap is better.

Dunlap stays healthy, doesn't play dirty and can do it all. He is much better than the stats show that is for damn sure.

(04-09-2018, 04:07 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: Exactly; they will both be signed.


That's why he's the better player; his impact extends far beyond the stats. Again, how much has HIS disruptions, allowed other guys to get sacks?

That's why he and Geno compliment each other perfectly.

But yeah, Burfict probably makes a bigger difference when he doesn't play, vs. when Dunlap doesn't play.

(04-09-2018, 04:11 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Great post, i agree and i am a much bigger fan of Burfict than you are Truck.

Dunlap might be the most disruptive End in the NFL, that is how good he is, cannot believe some people think we
should move on from him. Crazy talk i tell yah, crazy talk.

I agree!

There is a line in a scouting report I read about Quenton Nelson that stated you could plug him into the RG position on your line, and forget about it for the next 10 years. That language is used for can't miss prospects who are truly elite.

That is Dunlap in a nutshell.