05-15-2019, 03:32 PM
(05-15-2019, 02:34 PM)Au165 Wrote: This is exactly why "objectively reasonable" was established. Thanks for proving my point, also kudos to you for torpedoing your own argument by bring it into the discussion lol.
The Rodney King verdict would also prove your point, though his actions did not involve a death.
This is why juries disagree on what counts as "objectively reasonable." And why the consequences of such legal standards need to be continually evaluated in light of empirical evidence to make sure the standard in question is functioning as intended.
And what is my "argument" exactly--beyond a preliminary effort to align actions reported with current law?