06-29-2020, 03:29 PM
(06-29-2020, 03:07 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: In such an instance you are not protesting the person in their residence, they just happen to be across the street from a protest. Being the target of the protest is the issue, not the presence of a protest. My main issue with protesting outside someone's home is that you're essentially terrorizing them in their personal residence. You're also effectively imprisoning them in their residence. It's the same issue I have with burglary and why I despise how it is treated as a less than severe felony, you're destroying the person's feeling of safety in their home. I'll take freedom over safety every day, but inside your personal residence everyone should be able to feel safe. Also, let's be honest, protesting outside someone's home has only one goal, to make that person feel afraid.
Protesting is organized coercion. So I can see that argument.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
