Bad Boys II

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(06-29-2020, 09:24 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I already said to you in a response that they should be faulted for being on private property in this specific case. 

Speaking hypothetically, though, I don't think family is a shield for a lawful protest against a public official and for that reason I'm not suggesting that protestors shouldn't ever be able to protest in front of a politician's home.

So as long as a politician is unpopular to 50 or so unemployed people with nothing better to do, you're good with people parked outside their house 24/7, while 7am to 10pm (or whenever the local ordinance allows for unrestricted noise) drum protests outside their house? 

(06-29-2020, 09:52 PM)GMDino Wrote: Isn't this much like bringing your kid to a protest?

If you don't want your family exposed to public criticism and protests don't run for office.  I mean no one EXPECTS they will have 100 people protesting in front of their home when the get elected but that's the chance you take.  Why put your kids in that kind of position?  Right?  Because t might not be your home but it might be when eating dinner or out for a walk or "bring your daughter to work day".

That's why I feel bad for the family of people in office much more than the elected official themselves...they better be all in on everything that comes with the job.

So basically what you're saying is...



....and that nobody with children should be allowed to hold public office if they want their children to not be scared, to be able to play in their own yard without worry, and to get a sound nights sleep.