06-29-2018, 04:09 PM
(06-29-2018, 01:52 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: In this day and age, that is a real head scratcher, for sure. How does a program with a fairly rich history of being traditionally competitive, in a Power 5 conference, get to the point of having a substandard reputation for their strength program? I get it, that UCLA puts a high standard on academics, but so does Stanford. They're in Southern California, for crying out loud. That's like the cradle of cutting edge when it comes to athletic performance training systems.
I saw that i said problem instead of program, thanks for quoting me Sunset so i could see it.
Doesn't make any sense to me either, just remember reading this about Redmond. Another reason why i wasn't a big
fan of drafting Kolton Miller after hearing this. Sure would think UCLA wouldn't be playing it cheap if they wanted to be
competitive, never understood this.
