Tier 3 QB

[Shake n Blake]

(07-29-2018, 12:24 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Of course they're wrong all the time, just as are folks that put Andy top 10. If they were never wrong they'd be billionaires. It's simply my assessment that they have more credibility than fans on a message board.

Hell, I think Andy's ranked a little low and I hope he's the #1 ranked QB in the NFL this year, but I cannot dismiss potential simply because it is young. 

Folks keep bringing up DeShaun Watson. This question is for the board: You are GM of the new expansion Louisville Racers. You get to pick a QB who do you take Andy or DeShaun? 

If I get Andy at 22 years old, I'm taking Andy. The guy has proven that he can lead a team to the playoffs consistently and play at a high level. Not to mention he's an iron man of the position while Watson sustained a major injury after only 5 starts.

(07-29-2018, 12:50 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Befine I get what you're saying and agree with a lot, however, It's not dismissing a QB because he's young. That's a bit of a twist of the argument on your part.

I don't think anybody who watches football "dismisses" Jimmy G's potential, but at this point it's still just potential. You can't rank a QB young, old, in the middle, tall, fat, short, or whatever else in 13th place over proven with years of experience vets.

Now if he had a couple seasons under his belt it would be different. 7 games doe not make a rank of 13 in my book.

If you had a rookie LF in baseball who was a career 15-20 HR hitter with only average RBI's and he hit a HR in his first Major League at bat would you move your veteran producing hitter out of clean up and put him in ?

Bingo.