Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Another catch rule controversy?
#4
(01-06-2019, 08:36 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: To my way of thinking, it should have been treated the same as a fumble out of bounds.  Ball should go to the team to last have possession, at the spot of the fumble.  I guess we call that one an inadvertent whistle, as the official blew it dead, because from his point of view it looked incomplete?

Since the official was giving the incomplete signal, no one even bothered to pick up the ball.  If an Eagle had, like guys will often do, and had run it all the way back the other way, it would have had to have been a TD.  The one time nobody does...
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein

http://www.reverbnation.com/leftyohio  singersongwriterrocknroll



Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Another catch rule controversy? - McC - 01-06-2019, 08:39 PM
RE: Another catch rule controversy? - McC - 01-06-2019, 09:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)