01-14-2019, 03:40 PM
Anyway....to get back to the OP...
I think Andy, or whoever the QB ends up being, will be much better off. The thing you see with these new age offenses is how much more QB friendly they are. You watch these offenses and are struck by how many times the QB is hitting wide open receivers who were schemed open, which is a luxury we haven't seen nearly enough of here lately.
If you can fool defenses, then you're not relying on as much beating your man to get open.
Andy has proven he can be a top ten QB under the right circumstances(2015), so we ought to be able to at least get another year out of him. And if the new coach wants a new guy, then hopefully, he won't be shackled by outdated or overly predictable schemes.
I think Andy, or whoever the QB ends up being, will be much better off. The thing you see with these new age offenses is how much more QB friendly they are. You watch these offenses and are struck by how many times the QB is hitting wide open receivers who were schemed open, which is a luxury we haven't seen nearly enough of here lately.
If you can fool defenses, then you're not relying on as much beating your man to get open.
Andy has proven he can be a top ten QB under the right circumstances(2015), so we ought to be able to at least get another year out of him. And if the new coach wants a new guy, then hopefully, he won't be shackled by outdated or overly predictable schemes.
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein
http://www.reverbnation.com/leftyohio singersongwriterrocknroll
http://www.reverbnation.com/leftyohio singersongwriterrocknroll
