04-27-2019, 09:48 PM
(04-27-2019, 09:36 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Ok, so every expert that has launched opinions on reaches over the years, and there have been thousands, not just in the NFL, is wrong?
That's pretty much what you're saying. Everyone thinks this is a reach, but somehow it's not because it's the Steelers?
Oh, wait, that's right, you "don't know yet."
Why would anyone grade draft picks, and why would anyone read them, if they mean nothing?
He might turn out to be a steal, but, as of now, it's obvious that it was a stupid and wasted pick.
By the way, the crayons are to draw you pictures with pretty colors so you can understand since you obviously aren't understanding words.
Didn't think I'd have to explain that, but, once again, I overestimate Steelers fans.
I’m not saying they’re wrong. I’m saying the jury is still out. The two are not the same thing. I’m not limited to black and white thinking like you seem to be. I’m willing to live in the gray until there’s more evidence.
As for why I think people analyze the draft: Media ‘experts’ do it for an audience, which means their main goal is ratings. Coaches and GMs do it to build real teams.
Until proven otherwise, I’ll give the benefit of the doubt to the guys who do it for real, not the guys who do it for ratings. Could they be wrong? Sure. They often are. But they know their own teams better than the media does. I mean, seriously: Do you actually think that Bill Belichick asks Mel Kiper for draft advice?
And again, children’s books are not typically illustrated using crayons. A preschooler’s art is. But keep doubling down. It’s cute.
