09-05-2019, 12:44 PM
(09-05-2019, 12:33 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: So IF U of Cincy had say a Top 20 offense and was scoring 42 points per game, you think they would have still fired the HC?
And you think there is no correlation with having the 123rd ranked offense and a coach being fired? And also an OC being fired? (Plus, they could have fired Tuberville and kept Taylor if he was so great.)
College is the ultimate proving grounds for creative coaches to come in and install an offensive scheme that is innovative no matter what personnel they have. 123rd best offense is the result.
An lol at your strawman. I saw offensive coordinator experience. I say nothing about playcalling. But, OC's do, you know coordinate the offense and develop plays. An assistant WR coach and QB coach does none of that.
Yeah, I know they would've fired Tommy Tuberville whether the offense was bad or good because I actually followed and watched the team. Tuberville took the UC job as a vacation he got paid for. The team had completely regressed every year he was here, he'd worn out his welcome with the fanbase, was contentious with the media, refused to spend any real effort in recruiting, lost every bowl game he qualified for, and almost single handedly set the program back 2 decades. There's a pretty good reason that everyone talks about his time here with contempt.
If Zac's offensive playbook at Cincinnati was so bad surely they improved leaps and bounds after he left, right? They didn't.
