How Much Power Does ZT Have?

[Whatever]

(09-05-2019, 11:05 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Yeah...incorrect. Pollack wanted out and apparently the Bengals would have had to agree to let him go:



We’re getting some clarity on the Frank Pollack situation.


Apparently, it was not the Bengals who didn’t want Pollack back. Instead, it was Pollack who didn’t want to remain in Cincinnati.

It’s still unfortunate news, but at least the Bengals didn’t make the mistake of firing one of the NFL’s best offensive line coaches. 

http://totalbengals.com/bengals-rumors-ol-coach-frank-pollack-leaves-team/

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/nfl/bengals/2019/01/18/bx-pollack-departure-illustrates-ownership-investing-taylor-cincinnati-bengals/2603273002/

"[color=var(--body-5_-_color)]Despite keeping some of the coaches from the previous staff around, the Bengals are allowing Taylor to bring in his own guy on the line and getting rid of someone they believe in means Taylor is getting what he wants. As he should.[/color]

[color=var(--body-5_-_color)]It could have gone the other way. Ownership could have put their foot down and stood behind a proven in-house commodity. They didn't."[/color]


[color=var(--body-5_-_color)]The article you're citing even titles itself a rumor, meaning nothing concrete.  [/color]