10-02-2019, 12:45 AM
(10-02-2019, 12:41 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: No YOU don’t seem to get it. As rfaulk pointed out, Andy had a decent OL for 5 years. And he got us absolutely nowhere with it.
But back then the excuses were Marvin, the OC, lack of weapons, blah blah blah...
Nope. You don't get it either. Sigh.
The point of this thread is if the bad line for the last four years broke Andy. I posted that the only way to tell is if the line got better and Andy played bad. Then you could tell if Andy is "broken" from four years of bad line play.
All Faulk has done is post shit that has nothing to do with what I said. Nothing you posted had anything to do with what I said either. I never said anything about his first five years in my first post, since that has nothing to do with a bad o line breaking him. Go look up what a straw man is if you still don't get it.
