10-05-2019, 11:50 AM
(10-05-2019, 04:03 AM)Older Than You Too Wrote: I don't think you understood the very basic premise of my reply to the OP.
If Dalton was broken by 4 years of bad O-Line play, then the only logical measurement to see if Andy is broke, would be to have a better line and then see if he still played like he had a bad line. I'm not sure I can put it in terms more simple.
Do you not understand what the title of the thread was, or what the thread creator posted? Or who my post was directed at? At this point it's getting kind of ridiculous.
The subject of the thread is if Andy was broken do to a bad O-line. My reply is a direct posit to that subject.
The rest of your post has nothing to do with my reply to the topic creator. How many more synonyms do I have to use before you get this?
First of all, he hasn't had 4 years of bad Oline play. 2017 is when the bad line play started. Second, there's no need to "see if he's broken" by waiting and putting him in with a better line because we know how he plays behind a good line--as noted in my posts above.
Lastly, Dalton isn't broken. He just plays poorly behind a bad line due to his own shortcomings.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
