Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sounds like the Bengals aren't interested in trading players for picks
#46
(10-08-2019, 11:45 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Yep. There's a big cap savings on Glenn too.

You could go the Buffalo route and add 22 free agents...which did help them. But, yes - I like your moves.

Also yes - Like you said, this is a philosophical exercise that we won't do. A team like the Dolphins will likely sign those guys.

So then, a rebuild here would mean 3 wins for several years.

If they decided to take the dip...i wouldn't go too hog wild like the Bills. If they were to sign Conklin and Littleton, they still have their own guys. 

Double D, Hopkins, Fedj and Billings are UFAs and they have Wilson and Tupou as RFAs. Vigil is a UFA but i'm kind of mehhh on him. They could probably get him pretty cheap anyway. 

So, that's at least 8 they have to sign next year. Nine if you count Vigil. 





[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Sounds like the Bengals aren't interested in trading players for picks - rfaulk34 - 10-09-2019, 12:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)