12-29-2019, 06:08 PM
(12-29-2019, 02:30 PM)OswaldsLegacy Wrote: How can I not know his name... everyone post it and talks about him. Get over the extra letter that happens from time to time. Burrow or Burrows, you know who the person is. This is such a weak position.
You can play the what if game and it is simple here let me show you.
Is Burrows better than Mahomes, Jackson, Mayfield, Watson or Lawrence. If he is NOT then you don't take him. Why take a guy you aren't 100% sure on? Burrows will have to play against these guys while he is in the league and IF he isn't the guy that can beat them then why waste the pick?
My stance on Burrow has been pretty clear. He will be the pick, it will be a mistake. Now I am comparing him to other QBs to get other posters take on which of these 2 they would take. Looks like they will take Burrow and that is fine.
Of course all they seem to go on are these year's numbers. Post a pass that the WR made a great adjustment in order to make the catch. Of course the QB gets credit for the completion, but that is more on the talent of the WR making a great adjustment.
The Bengals had to play Brady this year so by your logic the Bengals shouldn’t draft a QB unless they can draft one better than Brady. But, only if the Bengals are 100% sure this yet to be named QB a s better than Brady. That is a weak position. There is no such thing as a sure thing in the draft. Burrow is a very good, but not perfect, QB prospect because there aren’t any perfect prospects. Including Brady when he was in the draft.
Instead of discussing hypothetical situations that are highly unlikely to happen such as a team trading away the chance to draft Lawrence to the Bengals, why don’t you actually discuss valid criticisms of Burrow like is he the product of a system or a one year wonder vs natural progression via hard work and experience?
