12-29-2019, 06:44 PM
(12-29-2019, 06:08 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: The Bengals had to play Brady this year so by your logic the Bengals shouldn’t draft a QB unless they can draft one better than Brady. But, only if the Bengals are 100% sure this yet to be named QB a s better than Brady. That is a weak position. There is no such thing as a sure thing in the draft. Burrow is a very good, but not perfect, QB prospect because there aren’t any perfect prospects. Including Brady when he was in the draft.
Instead of discussing hypothetical situations that are highly unlikely to happen such as a team trading away the chance to draft Lawrence to the Bengals, why don’t you actually discuss valid criticisms of Burrow like is he the product of a system or a one year wonder vs natural progression via hard work and experience?
What type of mental gymnastics did you have to do to come to this conclusion?
The logic is that IF Lawrence were eligible for the draft and he declared and you had Burrow and Lawrence, both available to you with this 1st pick, who do you take?
The lack of actual responses to the poll and thread and more of "Why are you asking this?" seems to indicate that some fans are scared that Burrows may not be the answer for us. I know that I have been accused of "scaring" fans, but either you like Burrow enough to take him no matter who he is up against or you don't.
I have already posted the criticisms of Burrow, it is in the 1st post. However this board should also be about this hypothetical situations to compare the 2 prospects that will be facing off in a few years. That is IF Burrows last that long.
