Joe Burrow vs Trevor Lawrence

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(12-29-2019, 06:51 PM)OswaldsLegacy Wrote: Finally someone with the sense to see the question and post actual thoughts and rebuttals.

What you say about Lawrence is true, but the point is that he did improve.  The numbers are similar but I give the edge to Lawrence because Lawrence has done it for longer, which speaks of sustained success.

If not for the year he had, Burrow may not even be in discussion.

So during the past two years Lawrence and Burrow both improved, but you give the edge to Lawrence because he has improved longer? Are Clemson years like dog years compared to LSU years?

And if Burrow didn’t improve he wouldn’t be in the discussion? What was it you just wrote? Something about, “the point is he did improve.” How did you forget your point from one paragraph to the next?