11-14-2017, 05:14 AM
(11-14-2017, 05:06 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: How is his opinion that 5 should get a shot over 14 (in a lost season) “irrelevant?”
Irrelevant definition - not connected with or relevant to something.
Quote:1) Dalton Lover- if McCarron was better then Dalton, then he would be starting!!
Debunked theory- I guess WJ3 is not as good as Dre Kirk or Adam Jones or he'd be starting. I guess Joe mixon wasn't better then Jeremy hill .
Irrelevant. What's the argument presented with WJ3 over Dre Kirk and Adam Jones? What does that have to do with Dalton. WJ3 is younger, not as experienced and part of the Marvin Lewis coached team. Not the same as a starting QB of a NFL team. Irrelevant.
Quote:2) Dalton Lover - we've seen enough of AJ McCarron and he wasn't any good!! I can't wait till McCarron is out of here so I don't have to hear it anymore!! Aj McCarron won the National Championship so what, he had a all star team and many qbs have won the title and not been good NFL qbs that's just college!!
Debunked - Aj McCarron has a 2-1 record at the end of a season when he came in cold , players have no contact scrimmages . So he had to adjust fast. Dalton lovers love to say but Dalton won the rose bowl, he's been a winner all his life!! Lol umm that hypocritical isn't it. Dalton has had 7 years and still needs more years to prove himself.
Nobody has argued Dalton winning a Rose Bowl. I'm not sure what that has to do with the argument, let alone the beginning sentence before that.
And it's ANOTHER argument about AJM vs Dalton. We have plenty of threads like that. I'm not denouncing the idea, but I fail to see the difference from his original thread.
