{The Ultimate ANDY DALTON Mega Thread}

[type_stripe]

(09-13-2015, 12:46 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: 1.) He had a higher QB rating and higher QBR as well.
2.) He had a higher completion percentage.
3.) He averaged more passing yards per game.
4.) He had a better TD to INT ratio.
5.) He averaged more yards per attempt.
6.) He rushed for more yards.

All this in a rookie year, with Matt Asiata as his main RB, and Greg Jennings and Jarius Wright as his 1/2 punch.  And he too lost his Tight End (Kyle Rudolph) for much of the season.

What's funny is that stat line you posted, which is supposed to convince us he didn't do that much yet, isn't far of from Andy Dalton's 16 game total in year 5. 3,398 for 19 and 17.  How sad is that?

Why not compare Dalton's rookie stats with Teddy's? It makes more sense to evaluate them at the same time in their careers than to start crying out Teddy had a better rookie year than Dalton's 4th year. I mean Teddy still has the upper hand in most categories, but the stats are similar. He's good and could be something else, but it Just doesn't make sense to say Teddy is a better option for the future because his rookie year was slightly better than Dalton's rookie and 4th years. 

RG3 rookie stat line through 15 games:  258/393, 65% comp., 3200 yard, 20 TDs, 5 INTs, 3 Fumbles (as passer), QBR (stupid stat) 75.6, and rating 102.4

What's RG3 today? the benchwarmer? Just wait before anything