09-30-2015, 03:32 PM
(09-30-2015, 02:11 PM)Brownshoe Wrote: And you actually think that they should even be close to each other? Lol Ok. I guess football isn't about scoring points and it's about who is more efficient. One QB has 1700 more yards 8 more TDs and 2 less INTs and only 1% less completion percentage, and he has a lower passer rating. Anyone who is shown those two stat lines and picks QB1 as a better QB has lost their minds.
Efficientcy does not = who's better. Passer rating = efficiency.
How often do inefficient football teams score points compared to the efficient ones?
How often do inefficient passing performances lead to winning games compared to efficient ones?
Your crusade against passer rating is just getting absurd.
