{The Ultimate ANDY DALTON Mega Thread}

[jj22]

(09-30-2015, 06:22 PM)djs7685 Wrote: Andy has played better in 2015 than he ever has in his career. This is just a case of you watching the stat sheets and the rest of us watching the games.

Stop the bullshit with the last paragraph, it's just a total waste of an argument because it makes you look like a complete joke. Nobody has ever said the wins are on the team but the losses are on Andy, so grow up and stop making shit up. Blatantly lying just makes you look stupid and doesn't help your argument. This is the exact bullshit that you always pull that makes you look silly in the Andy debates. You think you're going to write a "gotcha!" post by putting words into others' mouths.

Okay, here we go, I'll play the jj game. As always jj, we know the rules. Wins are on Andy, but losses are on the team. Maybe you should stop blaming the team for everything bad and giving Andy too much credit for everything. You need to stop calling him elite and stop saying that he's better than Joe Montana. You shouldn't say that he's the greatest quarterback of all time because that's wrong.

See? Are my arguments better now that I'm just making shit up?

Nobody is just watching the stat sheet. He won Offensive player of the month award for a reason. He was playing great the month of October in 2013. Big wins (last second drives) vs the Lions, Bills etc, big throws downfield for chunk yardage. Exactly who wasn't watching him that month (or maybe you really don't remember)? You are the only one denying that. And that's fine. Your entitled to your opinion.

I have to chuckle at known Dalton haters having to act like this is a new Dalton. Because he is playing good, and it doesn't fit their narrative that he's a bum, and a bottom 10 qb in the league. I expect it out of pundits, not fans who should have been watching him play the last 4 years and should know he's had elite stretches/games before.

By the way as many stats you throw around, don't tell me to not use stats when they don't benefit your argument. That's lame for the record, and you can do a little better than that with your comebacks. Now go back to arguing passer ratings (a stat) and remember telling me how I need to ignore stat in the same breath.