Andy just showed that he wasn’t the problem

[Joelist]

And can we stop this idea that being happy Andy was successful somehow means taking Burrow was the wrong move? Both can be true.

What it does show is the OL (whether it be the players or the scheme) is the root of the offensive issues. Burrow is a 1OA and arguably one of the best college QBs ever but the clown show on the line is making it almost impossible for him to succeed. Andy is a vet true but you could see the difference in the blocking and the impact - he was able to scan the field and step into his throws.