Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Carlos as a Bengal vs. Carlos as a Seahawk
#31
(11-09-2020, 12:03 PM)ochocincos Wrote: Bengals were using Dunlap as an OLB in a 3-4, but he thrived as a 4-3 DE.
Given his size (6'6", 285 lb), Dunlap really should have been used as a DE in a 3-4 with Lawson and Hubbard as the OLBs.

The real big problem the Bengals have is they don't have the DL to run a 3-4, especially with Dunlap gone.
Look at the Steelers for how to run a good 3-4.
Their DEs (Tuitt, Heyward) are both 6'5"+ and 290+ lbs. They have length and size.
Dunlap was the only guy who was close to that (6'6", 285 lb).
Atkins has to be inside, as he doesn't have the length to be on the edge. Same with Daniels, Covington, and Williams.

If this defense wants to stick as a 3-4, they need to get properly-sized DEs.
Or they need to go back to a 4-3, which they were built for by Marvin's crew.

I've been saying this all along and people on these forums criticize me that scheme as the fault is overrated.  Sigh.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Carlos as a Bengal vs. Carlos as a Seahawk - Yogo - 11-09-2020, 04:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)