05-20-2015, 10:01 PM
From a pure talent perspective, Tannehill >> Dalton. It's not too hard to understand when one was drafted 28 spots ahead of the other.
You put Tannehill on this team, no chemistry issues, why would it be shocking that he maybe would do better than what Andy's done?
You put Tannehill on this team, no chemistry issues, why would it be shocking that he maybe would do better than what Andy's done?
