02-24-2021, 04:07 PM
Boyd and Higgins are better at their positions, IMO, than anyone on our O-Line.
We are not the only team that wants good O-Line players, including teams that are considered otherwise "good." Yes, there are a lot of reasons, but I'm sure KC would have liked better/more O-line depth in the Super Bowl. Now, if I'm a good to great lineman, and I have a choice of playing for KC or Cincy, I'm going for who can get me closer to a ring.
Before anyone does the money talks thing, it's not like Cincy is the make it rain team, and when these so-called "better than average" Bengals players want to be paid better than average, we will have to pay them, too, or they walk. If Burrow is all that he is cracked up to be, we got this rookie deal with him now, and he is as cheap as he is going to be. Pretty much this is the one shot.
We are not the only team that wants good O-Line players, including teams that are considered otherwise "good." Yes, there are a lot of reasons, but I'm sure KC would have liked better/more O-line depth in the Super Bowl. Now, if I'm a good to great lineman, and I have a choice of playing for KC or Cincy, I'm going for who can get me closer to a ring.
Before anyone does the money talks thing, it's not like Cincy is the make it rain team, and when these so-called "better than average" Bengals players want to be paid better than average, we will have to pay them, too, or they walk. If Burrow is all that he is cracked up to be, we got this rookie deal with him now, and he is as cheap as he is going to be. Pretty much this is the one shot.
