College Pro Day Tracker

[Whatever]

(03-14-2021, 10:18 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: I think this is an overly uncharitable depiction of his prospect status. I think a more accurate way of putting it would be "a tackle that will be good if he does not overcome his size limitations, but great if he does." The size limitations are what keep him from being an elite prospect, not from him being a good prospect. He's already a really good prospect.

If we're splitting hairs, you cannot say he will be good if he can't overcome his size limitations or great if he does.  You can say he can or he should, but not that he will.  If he can't overcome his size limitations and can't get movement in the run game or gets beat because defenders can consistently get into his chest, he won't even be good though, so that's still not really an accurate statement.  

That aside, we both agree that he's not an elite prospect.  Why would we take him at 5, then?