Cuba's Lung Cancer Vaccine Coming To The US!

[BFritz21]

(11-03-2015, 11:51 AM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: Well that's new...While this is happening I'm going to see if you can now attempt to defend your $125 billion profits for medication that counteracts chemo side effects.  I challenge you to read the article you posted as proof again and then come back and see if your assertion is defendable.

I will however give you a hint.  It is not and it is a case of you not reading properly again.  Don't take my word for it though.  Really dig into the the reading and discover your mistake for yourself.  This is how you learn.

IF after you have read it again and you still don't see how you have misrepresented the facts, let me know and I will help you.  I will more likely use an educational strategy called scaffolding by which I will not show you or give you the answer, rather I will give you some hints and redirect you to the areas you need to review to find the answer yourself.

I was wrong about that site, but what about this one:

Quote:There will never be a “cure” brought to market because there just isn’t enough profit in eradicating the disease entirely.  There will never be a governing body that protects consumers from being subjected to known carcinogens, because that too, will stop the cash from rolling in. A great deal of research is covered up and many potential cures are ignored and discredited because there is far more money in perpetuating illness than in curing it. In 2012, the reported spending on cancer treatment was 124.6 billion dollars.  Blood money.

I guess they're wrong, too, and they somehow came up with a dollar value very, very, VERY close to the one I posted?

This site says how a doctor in Australia was bribed BY A BIG DRUG COMPANY to give patients a high dose of chemotherapy, when they only needed a low dose.

But what do Australians know?

Here's one more:

Quote:he reason so many celebrities are harmed or killed by the cancer industry is quite simple: The cancer industry is a for-profit business. It makes money by treating cancer, not by curing or preventing cancer.

My first post might have been wrong because it was late and I didn't read it entirely, which was a big mistake by me, but how about those?  What about the Cancer Doctor in Australia?  Doesn't that prove what I've been saying?

(11-03-2015, 12:34 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: Rep.

I'm proud of you for admitting that.
We all make mistakes.

I'm very hard-headed, but I can man-up when I've made an obvious mistake that's not just an opinion.