06-30-2022, 12:35 PM
(06-29-2022, 09:31 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Very possible, as I stated earlier. But even if this is some "cunning plan" (thank you Baldrick) it still involves this witness lying under oath, which is a poor look regardless of the motive behind it.
The fact that the Committee had already spoken to all 3 individuals prior to Ms. Hutchinson's testimony would seem to suggest they found her accounts / version of events credible based on what they heard in those closed door meetings or by other evidence that we don't yet know about.
I simply don't think they would put her in the spotlight, under oath, if they hadn't found her to be convincing and tenable.