06-15-2022, 02:56 PM
(06-15-2022, 01:42 PM)basballguy Wrote: Nash is a good enough shooter to appear on a list where it’s mostly big men. Same for Bird. Curry is not.
I can explain this shit to you but I can’t understand it for you.
Well at least you admit that you can't understand any of this
Larry Bird
Took 90% of his shots from 2-point range and hit .509%
Took 10% of his shots from 3-point range and hit .376%
Steve Nash
Took 70% of his shots from 2-pont range and hit .518%
Took 30% of his shots from 3-pont range and hit .427%
Steph Curry
Took 50% of his shots from 2-point range and hit .520%
Took 50% of his shots from 3-point range and hit .428%
Steph is better than both Bird and Nash at both 2-point and 3-point range. You just don't know math.
And just as a bonus Curry also has a better FG% (.908) than both Nash (.904) and Bird (.886).
Better put me back on ignore to keep from getting embarrassed again.