06-15-2022, 03:14 PM
(06-15-2022, 02:56 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Well at least you admit that you can't understand any of this
Larry Bird
Took 90% of his shots from 2-point range and hit .509%
Took 10% of his shots from 3-point range and hit .376%
Steve Nash
Took 70% of his shots from 2-pont range and hit .518%
Took 30% of his shots from 3-pont range and hit .427%
Steph Curry
Took 50% of his shots from 2-point range and hit .520%
Took 50% of his shots from 3-point range and hit .428%
Steph is better than both Bird and Nash at both 2-point and 3-point range. You just don't know math.
And just as a bonus Curry also has a better FG% (.908) than both Nash (.904) and Bird (.886).
Better put me back on ignore to keep from getting embarrassed again.
It's comical watching you grasp at straws and do mental gymnastics to win an internet argument.
I'll tell you what, If Steph retires after the NBA finals then he can be the best shooter ever.
I'll leave you with this gem from another thread:
(05-02-2022, 06:31 PM)basballguy Wrote: The best shooter of all time rocking career lows in FG% and 3PT%?Nash played till he was 39
Steph's stats this season? 43.7% FG% and 38.0% from 3PT. Steph is currently 34.
Nash's worst full season? 49.2% FG and 39.5% from 3PT....at age 36.
Nash also has about 100 more games played than Curry at the same age. So is it wear and tear? Who knows?
Curry put up decent numbers this year but if he wants to be known as the best shooter of all time he's gonna need to get his shit together next season.
