Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks?
#45
I think Gresham had the potential to be a really good TE. Like with most pass catching TEs, the Bengals wanted to make him a blocker. Had they used Gresham more split out wide and allowed him to be more of a pure receiver, I think a lot of people would have a different opinion.

That's not trying to defend Gresham, that is just simply my opinion. He made a lot of mistakes at inopportune moments. He always seemed to fumble when it hurt the most. I know when looking at his career that Gresham didn't really have a fumbling problem, he just fumbled in big moments.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - Whacked - 11-15-2015, 11:46 PM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - Whacked - 11-15-2015, 11:57 PM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - jason - 11-16-2015, 09:53 AM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - pally - 11-16-2015, 12:28 AM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - J24 - 11-16-2015, 01:19 AM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - Joelist - 11-16-2015, 01:36 AM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - Joelist - 11-16-2015, 01:45 AM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - Joelist - 11-16-2015, 02:13 AM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - bfine32 - 11-16-2015, 02:31 AM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - Joelist - 11-16-2015, 02:53 AM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - gobobro - 11-16-2015, 10:09 AM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - magikod - 11-16-2015, 11:26 AM
RE: Palmer + Gresham = Paybacks? - muskiesfan - 11-16-2015, 04:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)