09-11-2023, 07:53 PM
(09-11-2023, 06:51 PM)pally Wrote: It always comes back to forcing the woman into situations that Republicans prefer. They live in a fantasy world that didn't exist then and doesn't exist know and won't exist in the future.
Examples? We all understand abortion will be here, but what else?
Quote:why doesn't he require any man who impregnates a woman and doesn't pay child support to get a vasectomy with the first missed check?
Probably for the same reason we don't force a woman on welfare with multiple kids to get a tubal ligation after she gets pregnant again.
Quote:Let's require that a married man divorce his wife to marry his pregnant girlfriend.
Are married women who get pregnant via an affair required to divorce their husband and marry the new father? Smells like a false equivalency.
Quote:Let's let the incarcerated dude out of jail so he can support his family.
Are imprisoned women who are incarcerated released so they can care for their family? Another false equivalency.
Quote:Let's ignore the effects of the abusive husband because after all single motherhood is worse than watching her get beaten.
Huh? Who is advocating for that, or anything similar? False equivalency.
Quote:In the meantime, let's force the woman who knows she is not ready to be a parent physically, emotionally, or financially to have a child and then fail to offer assistance just because she doesn't have a man in the house
If you'd confined your post to the issue of abortion it would have actually made sense. Instead you engaged in a slew of false equivalencies that did nothing but obscure your point.
