04-11-2024, 06:22 PM
(04-11-2024, 06:01 PM)Dill Wrote: Say two hostages get free in Gaza, take off their shirts to show they have no weapons, and carry a white flag towards the IDF.
An IDF sniper, seeing the flag and no weapons, shoots them anyway. One is wounded and crawls into a building.
An IDF officer gives the order to finish off the unarmed, wounded man. Did the sniper kill the hostage? Well, maybe not the second one.
Family members think it's complicated. It was not a ricochet which killed either hostage. Not ok if they "didn't know who they were."
Two unarmed people carrying a white flag died because the IDF didn't take the requisite care for civilian life. That's "too complicated."
And looks like that's the routine. Were it not routine, two hostages would have been recovered. Even if Hamas is "ultimately responsible."
Let's say I give your apologist, oversimplified take on this 100% accuracy. It's still two hostages out of how many? Oh yeah, 253.
Quote:It's not complicated for Netanyahu. That's why the parents "take issue."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/09/netanyahu-rejected-ceasefire-for-hostages-deal-in-gaza-sources-say
Yeah, I get why they'd be upset. You wanna bet they still blame Hamas more than anyone else? I sure would.
Quote:Right. Gaza was like a sovereign state. Then the Hamas cowards decided to attack the most powerful country in the ME.
Yes, Gaza was "like" a sovereign state. Yes, then the terrorist animals of Hamas, the elected government of said state decided to attack Israel. Why, because they have the backing of Iran (still waiting for you to enlighten everyone about Al Quds day btw), who desperately didn't want to see further normalization of relations between Israel and the Arab nations.
Quote:The less you know, the simpler this gets. Got it?
Or, in your case, the more you know the more pontificating overly verbose drivel you post and the more you mitigate the actions of terrorists.
Got it?
