Lou anarumo

[casear2727]

(01-06-2024, 01:57 AM)007BengalsFan Wrote: I also compared total spending for offense being at 106.1 million which is 6th most in the NFL vs. the defense at 86.4 million which is 10th.  Both defense and offense require 11 guys plus their backups so it is what it is.   The Bengals have invested more in their offense but lets blame Lou and the defense when the offense is just as bad yet has more money invested into it.  If the Bengals had spent that much money on defense, they wouldnt have needed Nick Scott and could have brought back both Bates and Bell.


Its also funny to hear how great the offense was for a 5 game stretch of a 17 game season.   We need more than 5 good games from a 106 million dollar offense if we want to make the playoffs.   I guess 106 million for an offense doesnt buy what it used to.  

So lets just agree that you have an agenda or you simply are not very bright.  

Burrow was only healthy for 5 games, only the very dimwitted does not understand the negative impact that has on the offense, especially since he played very well in the 5 games he was healthy and we beat good teams.  If you are not capable of grasping this concept I suggest you become a putt putt golf expert instead of NFL message board analyst making insanely odd comments.


You dont seem to understand the rookie pay scale or the salary cap in general.   The fact you do not understand that Burrows cap hit is 20M this year is on you, not to mention that Chase and Tee are in the higher pay slots of their deal.

The defense has more rookies and none of them make as much as Tee.  None of them will ever hit Chase's numbers on his rookie deal.  

You simply do not understand how the salaries work and your assumption that we should not lose any games without Burrow being at full health reveals a total lack of understanding.