12-18-2015, 05:27 PM
(12-18-2015, 12:34 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: So, we all agree that no death threat was made and that Whitlock sounds like an idiot for stating the opposite. Consensus!
No consensus. You just want to think you won some sort of debate. He made a thinly veiled threat that could easily be interpreted to mean he intended bodily injury, or worse depending on interpretation. So both of you are right, and neither of you are right. Intentional ambiguity is a wonderful thing.
