06-10-2015, 12:44 PM
Here's what I want to know.
Why does every Andy argument come down to comparisons to Carson Palmer and other previous Bengals? That doesn't happen with any other player on this team.
When we discuss Andy, it's "Andy is good because franchise records and team wins!"
When we discuss any other player, it's "PlayerX sucks because he isn't a perennial All-Pro compared to the other players around the league!" from those same people.
I don't think I'll ever understand it.
Why does every Andy argument come down to comparisons to Carson Palmer and other previous Bengals? That doesn't happen with any other player on this team.
When we discuss Andy, it's "Andy is good because franchise records and team wins!"
When we discuss any other player, it's "PlayerX sucks because he isn't a perennial All-Pro compared to the other players around the league!" from those same people.
I don't think I'll ever understand it.
