11-27-2015, 01:15 AM
(11-26-2015, 11:10 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Yes, but they've been answered a thousand times.
I would pay any amount of money to cure my injuries, but guess what? Normal families can't pay any extensive amounts for the cure, even if it were available, and the treatment is valuable to the drug companies, so they're the ones that keep it suppressed.
Another reason why no cure has come out is companies will just start making it cost less and less, until finally it doesn't cost much money at all, which would stop revenue in the billions of drug companies.
Completely logical conclusion...... about as logical as saying that you're not a liar (don't even try to deny that one because you called me a liar and posted a link as proof of me lying when the link actually proved that you had posted what I stated you posted) and that I've never proven you wrong (which how many times has your story changed about that one? The latest one was that it was sarcasm, as if that made any sense).
:rolleyes:
You're missing the point and taking it out of context.
A cure for cancer is a one time thing because you need many treatments of chemo, radiation, or any other means to treat your cancer, whereas a cure you only need the one time cure.
I just was ignoring this thread because we're pretty much going in circles. I haven't been proven wrong.
So people can afford more expensive treatments, but not the less expensive cures even though people like you would pay anything? And the insurance companies and the government (Medicare/Medicaid) just pay for these more expensive treatments? And if companies will just make the cost of a cure less and less then why haven't they made the cost of a treatment less and less?
