Anybody Else's Dog HATE Dog Food?

[BFritz21]

(07-03-2015, 02:20 AM)MrRager Wrote: I never even said Pat was right. I said your thread was over the top ridiculous, and it was. You are holding onto this grudge and going completely insane to the point where you seem like a troll. You kept making claims that Pat was butthurt because Sherman is smart and good at football. Where did you get this idea?

People don't like him because he wouldn't shut the **** up about Crabtree for months and acted like a complete tool in the post game interview. It has nothing to do with being "butthurt." He also failed a drug test.

People can also have different opinions. I personally do not think he is as good as Revis and the NFL players can easily be swayed by publicity like the rest of us. Whit didn't even make the top 100. 

Also, your comment about Fred is over the top insane as well. You seriously cannot see that he was making a sarcastic joke to make fun of you and comment, "Why would he say that if he did not mean it?!" It's. A. Joke. That's why. 

These personal vendettas and insane grudge holding makes you seem a bit trollish. In another thread you even called someone a tool. Generally, you are not one to use name calling. The insanity you have displayed today (being more than your usual) and name calling led me to think you might just be trolling.

I guess I was wrong and you are just that petulant enough to let a few posters online getcha all cray.

Fred's comment that initiated it all was something like "I wonder why Brad is talking about Chemotherapy when he doesn't believe it exists because he has often said that pharmaceutical companies would never allow a cure to become public."  

How is that trying be funny?  Please explain the comedy in that.

Unless you mean that he was trying to be funny with his "I just wasn't sure if you knew it existed" comment, which might have been funny if it wasn't him just trying to cover his ass because he didn't think I'd call him out on his garbage.

 He failed ONE drug test, that was handled improperly and overturned, but also could have been because he drank from a teammate's water bottle that had a dissolved pill in it.  He wouldn't need to take the drug and, even if he did, he wouldn't risk his reputation or his good character on it.  

It's clear that Pat was butt-hurt because Sherman was smart and good at football because why else would he call a guy a d-bag and attempt to discredit his skills because he failed one test that wasn't even his fault?  Any teacher that wasn't butt-hurt would be going back to his students and telling them to model themselves after Sherman because (1)  grew up in a very bad neighborhood (Compton) and stayed out of trouble,  (2)  succeeded in school (took advanced classes that left him with better than straight A grades) AND football and ended up at Stanford.  How many other people from that neighborhood do you think have ended up at Stanford?  (3)  Had a very high GPA in college while succeeding in football,  (4) drafted into the NFL and STILL went back to finish his degree,  (5) mentors kids in bad situations, speaks to groups, and even has a charity that gets inner-city kids updated textbooks and school supplies.

He hadn't done it yet, but look how he was the first person to congratulate Brady, before Brady could even stand up, on winning a Super Bowl trophy that should have been the Seahawks' if not for one of the stupidest play calls in Super Bowl history, if not the stupidest.

Crabtree opened his mouth about Sherman.  Sherman is just supposed to let it go with one comment?  If you're going to talk about someone, you better be prepared for a backlash times 10 if you don't back it up.

Furthermore, they're divisional foes, so not just like it's some random player that he chose to have a beef with.  He sees Crabtree AT LEAST twice every year, so they're obviously going to talk trash about one another.  Only difference is that Sherman backs it up and comes even harder.