Anybody Else's Dog HATE Dog Food?

[BFritz21]

(07-03-2015, 12:26 PM)fredtoast Wrote: We are getting into semantics here but.  .  .  

"The new test, by scientists at the University of Padua in northern Italy, used the same fibers from the 1988 tests"


Originally you tried to claim that the tests were run on fibers from a different part of the cloth.  But if you are admitting that the tests were done on the same fibers from the same part of the cloth then I will agree with your point.

Different part of the cloth because the parts that were repaired weren't the same parts as the original cloth, which is why the datings were false.  

Either way, you claimed that the carbon dating proved it to be a fake, which is false.

I'm not sure if you just didn't know much about it or if it was like everything else where you just throw out false information (garbage) and expect everyone to blindly accept it because you think that you're intellectually superior to everyone.