Rank the Bengal QB

[t3r3e3]

(07-13-2015, 04:48 PM)fredtoast Wrote: We are talking about the talent of the receiver not the QB, and Wallace was one of the best WR in the league in Pittsburgh.  He averaged over 1000 per year his 4 seasons there.  He led the league with a 19.4 avg in '09 and averaged 21.0 yards per catch with 1200+ yards in '10.




Hartline has two 1000+ yard seasons, and his career yards per reception (14.2) is a full yard better than Jones (13.2)


He had more receptions and receiving yards last year than either Sanu or Jones have ever had in their careers.


[quote pid='28496' dateline='1436815909']
t3r3e3
   Clay is a decent move TE/ H back, and is a small upgrade over Gresham. 

You admit he was better than Gresham

And finally you don't even mention Brandon Gibson who had two 50+ reception seasons with the Rams before coming to Miami.
[/quote]


Wallace wasn't even the best WR on the Pittsburgh team, and is a limited route runner with selfish tendencies. AJ blows Wallace out of the water.
Marvin Jones had a better season than anything Hartline, Brandon Gibson, or Landry has ever put up. Way more TD's, more yards per game, etc... Hartline is a low upside, high volume dependent possession receiver. He might get to 90 catches, but only nets around 1k yards and around 3-5 touchdowns. There's no upside there. Landry is a slow footed possession receiver, albeit one who runs exceptional routes and has a future in the league, especially playing with a QB of Tannehill's talents. Clay is a bit better than Gresham as a receiving threat, but is arguably a worse blocker. Andrew Hawkins is arguably a better slot WR than anyone Miami has. And we're talking abut Brandon Gibson during Tannehill's best season, and not the pre injury Brandon Gibson, still of middling talent, who played for StL. And I remind you again that Miami's line is absolutely terrible. I don't think you're winning here counselor. Some of the jurors seem to have spoken in the last few posts.