04-04-2017, 08:08 PM
(04-04-2017, 12:15 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: [ -> ]I still don't want my TE blocking a DE in pass pro.
Only if its butt. Nobody else has that ability. But yeah i get what ur saying.
(04-04-2017, 12:15 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: [ -> ]I still don't want my TE blocking a DE in pass pro.
(04-04-2017, 08:08 PM)Jpoore Wrote: [ -> ]Only if its butt. Nobody else has that ability. But yeah i get what ur saying.
PFF Wrote:Inexperience in pass protection; hasn’t shown strong ability in pass protection when asked to stay in.
Asked to pass block on just 11.6 percent of his passing snaps last season (167th out of 197 draft-eligible tight ends); surrendered eight pressures on 85 pass block attempts over the past two seasons.
(04-05-2017, 09:41 AM)ochocincos Wrote: [ -> ]Why do you keep saying that Jake Butt is an elite pass blocker?
https://www.profootballfocus.com/draft-pff-scouting-report-jake-butt-te-michigan/
(04-05-2017, 07:38 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: [ -> ]Got news for you, there is no such thing as an elite pass blocking TE. If there was, he would be playing OT and making a ton of money.Again he did it against bosa. And witten does it on a weekly basis. Now ur not blocking them for 4-5 seconds, but 3.
Sorry, you put Jake Butt up against any of the top DEs in this class and he would get embarrassed in pass pro
(04-05-2017, 07:21 PM)Jpoore Wrote: [ -> ]Because I go off of my eyes. I've seeen butt stand up bosa 1 on 1 multiple times in a game multiple years. Also went back and watched tape of him. And according to one NFL executive he is like Jason written which is who I have compared him to.
Daniel Jeremiah Wrote:Pass protection is another area where he needs work. He does a nice job of staying square but he's too flimsy and will get torqued and tossed by defensive ends.
(04-02-2017, 01:30 AM)09ItsOurTime Wrote: [ -> ]There are few players in the top 15 who I want less than O.J. Howard.
People keep saying we don't need a Safety because we have 2 OK starters, or we dont need a LB because we signed an average starter for 1 year. But O.J. Howard would be the 3rd target AT BEST.
I don't see this Bengals coaching staff ever being able to effectively use 2 top TE's. It just doesn't make sense unless they're preparing for Eifert to leave next year, in which case they should trade him now for a 1st+.
His only redeeming qualities to me are that he is athletic(though it doesn't translate to scores) and he can block(in which case they should be going after o-linemen)
Just look at his stats, over 4 years of playing he has a total of 6 touchdowns. SIX, over 4 years...
(04-06-2017, 06:43 PM)kevin Wrote: [ -> ]I can't.....WE have been drafting TE and CB way too much in the 1st rounds. ....It's time to draft a position other than TE or CB......Myself, I would never draft a TE in round one unless the pick is around 32. We pick at # 9 and a TE there is just stupid when we can get the LSU RB or the Bama LB or a D Lineman that has fallen to us. Those are Pick 9 picks, not a TE....
I guess I didn't try to sell you on OJ at all. If they take TE at pick 9 it only tells me our Bengals don't understand how to build a play-off game winner so therefore why we never win one.
(04-04-2017, 08:08 PM)Jpoore Wrote: [ -> ]Only if its butt. Nobody else has that ability. But yeah i get what ur saying.
(04-07-2017, 12:46 AM)B3ng4Ls420 Wrote: [ -> ]Howard>Engram>Butt........before the injury this is different
(04-03-2017, 01:32 PM)ochocincos Wrote: [ -> ]That's fair. But then who really is better for the #9 pick?
The league is continuing to deemphasize the RB position to the point you can spend a mid-late round pick and get good production. Plus, LF might not dominate given the poor quality of run blocking the OL has done recently.
DE is debatable because while Barnett had great production in college, he is limited athletically.
WR could make sense, but I think it made more sense if the Bengals didn't re-sign LaFell. Now I think they wait until the middle rounds to get another WR to groom. A WR in the first will likely get just as much or less offensive snaps than Howard.
I hope no CB because the Bengals have enough depth at CB.
I could maybe see safety if Adams or Hooker is available, but how often would they get used? Would the Bengals be willing to push Shawn Williams to nickel LB to get a first round safety on the field?
I think Howard makes the most sense because he would fit this offense well, would provide a great red zone weapon, and would provide good insurance for if/when Eifert gets injured and potentially leave in FA next year. Some might say, "Well, if a deal can't be worked out, just tag Eifert." Given the tag amount is just short of $10 million, that seems unlikely the Bengals would use the Franchise Tag. It's very feasible the Bengals take the "luxury" TE for this year and only have to dedicate about $3 million for the #9 overall pick (2016 #9 overall only only counted $2.8 mill toward the cap), then they only approach $5 million by the end of the fourth year. So it makes sense from a Bengals financial perspective.
As a rookie, I see Howard being able to contribute both as a blocker and receiving weapon (especially in the red zone). Then take over as TE1 after Eifert leaves in FA in 2018.
(04-06-2017, 01:06 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: [ -> ]One of my favorite TE's that we could draft.
https://www.profootballfocus.com/draft-pff-scouting-report-george-kittle-te-iowa/
Stats to know: Has only allowed a single quarterback pressure over the last two seasons combined. Earned the second-highest run blocking grade (79.6) in 2016 among the TE draft class.
EDIT:
OJ Howard is rated as their best Run Blocker.