11-18-2017, 08:34 PM
Burfict quit standing over dudes. quit stepping on dudes. quit being an all around scum bucket.
Play football. Make a play. Go back to huddle. Repeat
Play football. Make a play. Go back to huddle. Repeat
(11-18-2017, 09:08 PM)treee Wrote: [ -> ]I'm done with Burfict. He comes with all of the baggage and he has played like crap this year. Maybe if he was still on an elite level I would feel worse about his mistreatment.
(11-18-2017, 07:10 PM)reuben.ahmed Wrote: [ -> ]NBA had refs that cheated it up, you can't seriously believe the NFL has totally clean players, coaches, referees, and employees top to bottom. Where there's massive money, there are dishonest people.Here's the way I see it...
(11-18-2017, 09:08 PM)treee Wrote: [ -> ]I'm done with Burfict. He comes with all of the baggage and he has played like crap this year. Maybe if he was still on an elite level I would feel worse about his mistreatment.Who hasn’t?
(11-18-2017, 09:59 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: [ -> ]Who hasn’t?
(11-18-2017, 09:33 PM)BMK Wrote: [ -> ]Here's the way I see it...
Most all the refs are professional people in private life... Doctors, judges, lawyers, corporate executives, business owners, etc. The rule was (not sure if it still is) that their salary for being a ref cannot exceed 50% of their regular 'day job" salary... The average salary of refs is $147,000.00, which means these guys are already making a boatload of money well before their ref pay. The idea is that no ref actually needs the money. Refs are not employees of the NFL, they are independent contractors (though that all may change if they hire full timers) .
It just makes no sense to me that they would purposely jeopardize their personal livelihoods, lifestyles, community and family standing, corporate and charitable board memberships, etc, etc, which they would certainly lose, if caught in some cheating scandal or team / player bias. For what? What do they have to gain? And as we know from the NBA...sooner or later you get caught. Making "phantom" calls, etc only hurts themselves and affects their performance score and permanent record.
Just because Burfict is on a short leash is not cheating. He has a history of trying to hurt opponents. He should be on a short leash. It's like the cops in your neighborhood. They know exactly who the troublemakers are, who has a history of causing trouble, and you can bet they keep a sharper eye on them than other folks. It is what it is...if you don't like it, then you shouldn't have given them cause.
I truly believe, in reality, if there really was some kind of conspiracy to "get" certain teams or players or to 'favor' certain teams (as if they really care) it would have surfaced pretty quickly. Someone would have wanted no part of it and gone public by now.
Now, when NFL hires full time refs that are actually employees of the league, that might be a different conversation.
(11-18-2017, 09:33 PM)BMK Wrote: [ -> ]Here's the way I see it...Also what ref is going to come out and say yeah I called wrong stuff on purpose. He'd be out of a job.and probably out of his pension from the nfl.
Most all the refs are professional people in private life... Doctors, judges, lawyers, corporate executives, business owners, etc. The rule was (not sure if it still is) that their salary for being a ref cannot exceed 50% of their regular 'day job" salary... The average salary of refs is $147,000.00, which means these guys are already making a boatload of money well before their ref pay. The idea is that no ref actually needs the money. Refs are not employees of the NFL, they are independent contractors (though that all may change if they hire full timers) .
It just makes no sense to me that they would purposely jeopardize their personal livelihoods, lifestyles, community and family standing, corporate and charitable board memberships, etc, etc, which they would certainly lose, if caught in some cheating scandal or team / player bias. For what? What do they have to gain? And as we know from the NBA...sooner or later you get caught. Making "phantom" calls, etc only hurts themselves and affects their performance score and permanent record.
Just because Burfict is on a short leash is not cheating. He has a history of trying to hurt opponents. He should be on a short leash. It's like the cops in your neighborhood. They know exactly who the troublemakers are, who has a history of causing trouble, and you can bet they keep a sharper eye on them than other folks. It is what it is...if you don't like it, then you shouldn't have given them cause.
I truly believe, in reality, if there really was some kind of conspiracy to "get" certain teams or players or to 'favor' certain teams (as if they really care) it would have surfaced pretty quickly. Someone would have wanted no part of it and gone public by now.
Now, when NFL hires full time refs that are actually employees of the league, that might be a different conversation.
(11-18-2017, 11:05 PM)bengalsturntup5532 Wrote: [ -> ]Do you know these guys personally? How would you know for sure? I think if anybody really thinks there's not favoritism atleast or some type of rigging ,you are just blind lol. Th eres too much that points to it,and the rules help it's causes. You could basically call holding on any play. So if there's a big play,oh I'm sorry I seen holding there,bring it back. And nothing nobody can say or do about it. The refs seem to make rules up on the spot too . Like the tuck rule,and our playoff game,and just come out and say we are adding that next year sorry about that. Comical
(11-18-2017, 07:10 PM)reuben.ahmed Wrote: [ -> ]NBA had refs that cheated it up, you can't seriously believe the NFL has totally clean players, coaches, referees, and employees top to bottom. Where there's massive money, there are dishonest people.
(11-18-2017, 09:33 PM)BMK Wrote: [ -> ]Here's the way I see it...
Most all the refs are professional people in private life... Doctors, judges, lawyers, corporate executives, business owners, etc. The rule was (not sure if it still is) that their salary for being a ref cannot exceed 50% of their regular 'day job" salary... The average salary of refs is $147,000.00, which means these guys are already making a boatload of money well before their ref pay. The idea is that no ref actually needs the money. Refs are not employees of the NFL, they are independent contractors (though that all may change if they hire full timers) .
Now, when NFL hires full time refs that are actually employees of the league, that might be a different conversation.
(11-19-2017, 02:09 AM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: [ -> ]Anyone see the video of what got him ejected?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naKJ2i7Ke6E&feature=youtu.be
He's helping Pacman up, Titan pushes him, he turns and just looks at the guy, Ref "separates" the two in that he puts his hands on Burfict who isn't doing anything and then Burfict looks like he reaches for his helmet, ref throws the flag, ejects Burfict.
I think it is perfectly clear that the refs are targeting him.
(11-18-2017, 11:50 AM)jason Wrote: [ -> ]Remember when Vontaze Burfict made plays?
(11-18-2017, 09:33 PM)BMK Wrote: [ -> ]Here's the way I see it...
Most all the refs are professional people in private life... Doctors, judges, lawyers, corporate executives, business owners, etc. The rule was (not sure if it still is) that their salary for being a ref cannot exceed 50% of their regular 'day job" salary... The average salary of refs is $147,000.00, which means these guys are already making a boatload of money well before their ref pay. The idea is that no ref actually needs the money. Refs are not employees of the NFL, they are independent contractors (though that all may change if they hire full timers) .
It just makes no sense to me that they would purposely jeopardize their personal livelihoods, lifestyles, community and family standing, corporate and charitable board memberships, etc, etc, which they would certainly lose, if caught in some cheating scandal or team / player bias. For what? What do they have to gain? And as we know from the NBA...sooner or later you get caught. Making "phantom" calls, etc only hurts themselves and affects their performance score and permanent record.
Just because Burfict is on a short leash is not cheating. He has a history of trying to hurt opponents. He should be on a short leash. It's like the cops in your neighborhood. They know exactly who the troublemakers are, who has a history of causing trouble, and you can bet they keep a sharper eye on them than other folks. It is what it is...if you don't like it, then you shouldn't have given them cause.
I truly believe, in reality, if there really was some kind of conspiracy to "get" certain teams or players or to 'favor' certain teams (as if they really care) it would have surfaced pretty quickly. Someone would have wanted no part of it and gone public by now.
Now, when NFL hires full time refs that are actually employees of the league, that might be a different conversation.
(11-18-2017, 09:33 PM)BMK Wrote: [ -> ]He has a history of trying to hurt opponents. He should be on a short leash. It's like the cops in your neighborhood. They know exactly who the troublemakers are, who has a history of causing trouble, and you can bet they keep a sharper eye on them than other folks. It is what it is...if you don't like it, then you shouldn't have given them cause.