(11-25-2017, 09:23 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]It's not a matter of if he can run 99 yards... it's a matter of who wants to tackle a shirtless Andre?
If nobody wants to tackle you, you don't need to run! 
Not sure why mind mind went there, but the first thing I visioned when reading your text was trying to tackle a greased pig? I need help!
(11-24-2017, 03:14 PM)StoneTheCrow Wrote: [ -> ]Healthy scratch
And still a better chance than our a few of the starters
Bullock?
![[Image: th?id=OIP.s3Sb8eW5eqZyPYESw56tAgDqEs&pid...=300&h=300]](https://tse4.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.s3Sb8eW5eqZyPYESw56tAgDqEs&pid=15.1&P=0&w=300&h=300)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/HPvfnOuz1tOgg/giphy.gif)
Those backwards passes tick me off, too. So do the straight-ahead runs that only get two yards or so. I don't know enough to know what else they could do, but in the years the Bengals scored more there was more razzle-dazzle, screens, and reverses and stuff like that. The Browns game is a good opportunity to try some stuff and see if it might work against the Steelers.
I'm going to go with Huber.
Kraft, Gio, Mixon, LaFell all seem to be most likely to get scores
No
AJ Green is on my fantasy team and the only one I want to see score.
But hypothetically ……………….Gio