Brandin Cooks dropped a probable TD there.
I dont think that’s a fumble
(01-21-2018, 07:20 PM)michaelsean Wrote: [ -> ]I dont think that’s a fumble
,Yeah, surprised it was upheld. especially against the Pats.
(01-21-2018, 07:22 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: [ -> ],Yeah, surprised it was upheld. especially against the Pats.
It was a tough call. However, the ball really never left the body or hit the ground. I agree with no fumble.
They're stuffing Fornett.. He's getting nothing right now..
Without a turnover it's not looking good for Jax.. The D seems to be giving up too much too often..
What happen ed to jags d???
Cue the "refs help Pats" theorists
Flag time.. Penalize em into the end zone.. Just watch..
(01-21-2018, 07:42 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: [ -> ]Cue the "refs help Pats" theorists
Well... It's not exactly without precedent..lol
(01-21-2018, 07:42 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: [ -> ]Cue the "refs help Pats" theorists
To be fair, they have flagged the Pats once today
Man I had hope the jags were gonna win this but game over now
(01-21-2018, 07:47 PM)TheUberHuber Wrote: [ -> ]Man I had hope the jags were gonna win this but game over now
Really? I guess I should turn off TV then. LOL...
Might wanna challenge the catch..IDK...looks like it bounced back up.. I guess not..
omg. Stop with the silly conspiracy stuff. It was a fumble and it was a catch. The refs haven't done anything to influence this game.
The Jags need to get to Brady and not let him camp in the pocket. It's as simple as that. Plus, they stopped throwing all the screens and mis-directions that worked in the first half.
Hmm.. Could this sudden outbreak of injuries be planned? A conspiracyist might think so... I doubt it though..