This team is completely content with how it wins and operates business. Be serious for a second, Marvin and Mike go on and on how the job isn't done yet, even though the past two seasons have been 7-9. Nothing has changed to even bring this team forward in any way shape or form. We re-sign a coach who should've been let go years ago and make very little changes in coaching.
When the draft comes were going to pick up an injured player no other team would touch and consider it a "Steal".
Then the season will start and...well you know this story.
So Marvin you pick players that will fit, but at the end of the day you'll be giggling and giving the same canned responses why this team is underachieving and losing.
(03-04-2018, 01:14 PM)GodFather Wrote: [ -> ]When the draft comes were going to pick up an injured player no other team would touch and consider it a "Steal".
Then the season will start and...well you know this story.
Yep - Mr. Brown will consider it a successful season before it even begins.
![[Image: 200_d.gif]](https://media1.giphy.com/media/xTiTnqUxyWbsAXq7Ju/200_d.gif)
(03-04-2018, 01:23 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: [ -> ]Yep - Mr. Brown will consider it a successful season before it even begins.
![[Image: 200_d.gif]](https://media1.giphy.com/media/xTiTnqUxyWbsAXq7Ju/200_d.gif)
If Brown set the same bar in his finances that he does running a football organization, he would be homeless.
(03-03-2018, 01:41 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: [ -> ]Good point. They were being reactive rather than proactive with those trades.
I think the overall point is that the Bengals are never aggressively active trying to improve the team quickly. We all know what it looks like when a team does that. It's like when NE won the SB and still made major signings and trades. Even with our best trade (a scrub for Reggie Nelson) was more luck than aggression. Nelson was viewed as a guy that wasn't panning out. That's why we got him for peanuts. It worked out great, but it wasn't considered a bold move at the time.
It was classic Mike going for value with a former 1st round flop. It just panned out that time. 9 times out of 10, it hasn't panned out. It's a lazy move. Not aggressive championship stuff. Heck, all teams take a chance on former flops, but they also get aggressive when they smell that they're close...or when the team has a clear need. The Bengals NEVER get aggressive. I've even seen Fred admit as much.
Spot on !
And I'm quite sure the Bengals will Bengal away free agency this year and sit on their hands the first week being anything but aggressive. And the remaining good core of the team will watch their chances of doing anything here, disappear.
(03-02-2018, 01:40 PM)GodFather Wrote: [ -> ]Marvin Lewis quote:
"Lewis on Free Agency: Being active is taking care of our own folks and then it goes from there. We are going to bring people to the org that fits."
https://twitter.com/pauldehnerjr/status/969575693167288320
Well wasn't he just saying after his re-signing that the team NEEDS to be more active in free agency and it hasn't done that enough in the past?
He certainly is singing a different tune less than a month later.
Can we start a pool about whether this team will go over or under .500 this season? Count me in as under...
Too bad that
fits means: a player who was cut by the other team, is willing to take a cheap "prove it" deal and can't get a better offer elsewhere.
That about sizes up what Mikey boy sees as
fitting this organization.