(05-03-2018, 01:39 PM)Neon Icon Wrote: [ -> ]It was puzzling last year that Westerman and Redmond didn't play as Hopkins was terriblez.
I think that Pollacks aggressive blocking scheme will be eazier to learn than Alexanders passive wait to be attacked scheme.
Agree with all of this. I'm not a Hopkins fan and am excited about Redmond and Westerman. I think they got a flavor of Pollack's scheme at the end of last season. I will be interested if we build on that and can pass protect better.
If we can do both of those things - and stop the run better - we should be a much better team.
(05-03-2018, 01:39 PM)Neon Icon Wrote: [ -> ]It was puzzling last year that Westerman and Redmond didn't play as Hopkins was terriblez.
I think that Pollacks aggressive blocking scheme will be eazier to learn than Alexanders passive wait to be attacked scheme.
I don't know much about the variety of blocking schemes you can run, but is a passive scheme like this EVER a good idea? It feels like you'd always give the initiative to the defensive line (plus I'd imagine you're more likely to get tackled behind the LOS / have the pocket collapse on the QB).
Has anyone ever run this sort of thing effectively?
(05-03-2018, 02:18 PM)dnkw Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know much about the variety of blocking schemes you can run, but is a passive scheme like this EVER a good idea? It feels like you'd always give the initiative to the defensive line (plus I'd imagine you're more likely to get tackled behind the LOS / have the pocket collapse on the QB).
Has anyone ever run this sort of thing effectively?
Guys like Mathis fit better in aggressive schemes once they left.
I hate to say it, but didn't Bodine set bench press records in college? He might be decent in a different scheme. The Billz must think so.