Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise

Full Version: ***Week 17 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Steelers***
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
LOL

Only against the bungles. Only us.
Nobody ever misses FGs against us.
I have to say...on a good defense, you could maybe hide Vigil as the 3rd LB...but if he's your best guy...you're in big trouble.

IF we can draft a really good LB, Vigil as the 2nd best might be ok...but it's not preferable. We need to get 2 new LB's.
...and we’re losing, just like that.
Lucky bounce.
Geez vigil either over pursues or is nowhere close
We been callin plays like punk asses so far this game
welp
So bungles....as always the bounce goes against them...
Kickers NEVER ***** miss "career longs" against the Bengals. No matter who, no matter how long. 

Ever
Little Harry Potter probably can out kick Fat Randy.
A Marvin Lewis team blows a two score lead by allowing a team to score a bunch of unanswered points? Shocked, I say.
(12-30-2018, 08:56 PM)Fan_in_Kettering Wrote: [ -> ]...and we’re losing, just like that.

This is how they ALWAYS go against the Steelers.

It's like they know they will beat us no matter what.
(12-30-2018, 08:55 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: [ -> ]Vigil just so slow... they keep picking on him because they know he can't keep up.

Too stubby
Vigil is not a 3rd down backer. Please get him off the field.
Ravens driving. Down to the Browns 25
Vigil is fine as an inside LB. That play was a whole defense screwup as everyone else just released on the RB for no reason and Vigil did good to get to him as fast as he did.
That 3 points may as well be 30 with this offense. Nice effort by the D today however. Theyve allowed some yards but have played well where it counts
(12-30-2018, 08:57 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: [ -> ]Little Harry Potter probably can out kick Fat Randy.

Fat Randy nailed his 49 yarder down the middle with plenty of room to spare when asked.
(12-30-2018, 08:54 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: [ -> ]No it wouldn’t.

Not at all